Spotify Removed 500,000 Streams After a Prediction-Market Spike. Here Is the Artist Lesson.
A Malcolm Todd track briefly hit No. 1 on Spotify's US chart after a suspicious spike tied to Kalshi betting. Spotify later removed more than 500,000 plays it considered artificial.
Short answer
On July 2 and 3, 2026, Spotify confirmed through press statements that it removed more than 500,000 streams from Malcolm Todd's track Earrings after identifying plays it did not believe came from genuine listeners. Reporting from Music Business Worldwide, CBS News, WIRED, and the Financial Times connected the spike to suspicious activity around Kalshi prediction-market bets on Spotify chart outcomes. Spotify has not accused Todd or his team. The artist takeaway is practical: artificial streaming can be triggered by outsiders, charts can be corrected after the fact, and suspicious spikes are a royalty, reputation, and distributor-risk issue even when the artist did not buy the plays.
Spotify removed more than 500,000 streams from Malcolm Todd’s Earrings after a suspicious chart spike tied to Kalshi betting activity. Spotify has not accused Todd or his team. The lesson for independent artists is that artificial streaming can still land on your record, even if you did not buy it, and you need clean proof of your own promotion.
Key takeaways
- Spotify removed more than 500,000 streams from Earrings after identifying plays it did not believe came from genuine listeners.
- Reporting from CBS News, WIRED, the Financial Times, and Music Business Worldwide connected the spike to suspicious activity around Kalshi prediction-market bets on Spotify chart outcomes.
- Spotify has not accused Malcolm Todd or his team of buying the streams.
- Independent artists should treat strange stream spikes as a risk signal: document legitimate promotion, watch distributor notices, and do not touch playlist or stream guarantees.
What happened?
Malcolm Todd’s track Earrings briefly jumped to No. 1 on Spotify’s US daily chart after a sharp stream increase. Multiple outlets reported that the move lined up with betting activity on Kalshi, where users were wagering on Spotify chart outcomes. Spotify later removed more than 500,000 plays it believed were artificial and updated the chart.
The important caveat is simple: there is no public evidence that Todd or his team caused the manipulation. That is exactly why the story matters for working artists. A track can become part of a manipulation event because someone else has a financial incentive around the chart, not because the artist ordered fake streams.
Why independent artists should care
Artificial streaming is usually discussed like an artist scam: someone buys plays, the distributor flags the track, and the artist pays the cost. This case shows a different shape. If outside incentives can push fake listening toward a song, the artist still has to deal with the mess: corrected charts, confused fans, distributor questions, and a public story that can follow the track.
| Legitimate signal | Risk signal | |
|---|---|---|
| Source | Campaign, sync, creator use, editorial placement, tour moment | Unknown playlists, repeated bot-like listening, sudden market-linked spike |
| Your evidence | Ad receipts, posts, press, influencer links, distributor reports | No matching campaign or audience behavior |
| Next move | Archive the proof and keep watching retention | Screenshot analytics and ask your distributor before it escalates |
A spike is only good news when you can explain where it came from.
What to do now
Do not buy chart pressure
Avoid any service that guarantees streams, playlist placement, chart movement, or a fixed listener count. Spotify’s own artist guidance is clear that artificial streaming can lead to removals, royalty withholding, and distributor action.
Keep a promo paper trail
Save the receipts for legitimate spikes: ad campaigns, creator posts, press coverage, tour announcements, email sends, playlist adds, and screenshots from Spotify for Artists. If your distributor asks why a track moved, you want a boring answer with dates.
Watch for outsider spikes
If streams jump with no matching saves, follows, geography, or promo activity, capture the analytics and contact your distributor. Do not wait until a fraud report arrives.
What is still unclear?
Open questions
Spotify has confirmed artificial streams were removed, but public reporting has not proven who caused the manipulation or whether any prediction-market user ordered it. It is also unclear whether platforms will build special protections around chart betting. The safe artist move does not depend on that answer: keep promotion clean and keep records when the numbers move.
Sources
Related Velveteen guides
Get music industry updates without the noise
Short notes on platform changes, royalty issues, and release marketing moves that actually affect independent artists.
Was this useful? Send a signal or flag a correction.