Industry update

Canada Just Ordered ISPs to Block Stream-Ripping Sites: Why It Matters for Your Royalties

The Federal Court of Canada issued the country's first music-industry site-blocking order, forcing nine ISPs to block stream-ripping domains that strip royalties from your streams.

Bradley J Simons
Bradley J Simons
Updated June 19, 2026

Short answer

On June 15, 2026, the Federal Court of Canada issued the first site-blocking order in the country's history obtained for the music industry. Secured by Music Canada, it requires nine major ISPs, including Bell, Rogers, and TekSavvy, to block four stream-ripping domains for two years. Stream ripping converts a licensed stream into a permanent download, cutting artists out of the royalty that stream would have paid.

Key takeaways

  • On June 15, 2026, the Federal Court of Canada issued the country's first music-industry site-blocking order.
  • Nine major ISPs, including Bell, Rogers, and TekSavvy, must block four stream-ripping domains via DNS for two years.
  • Stream ripping turns a licensed stream into a permanent download, cutting the artist out of the royalty that stream would have paid.
  • A fast-track provision lets Music Canada add copycat domains without a full new hearing each time.

What happened?

On June 15, 2026, the Federal Court of Canada issued the country’s first music-industry site-blocking order. Secured by Music Canada (the trade body for Sony, Universal, and Warner’s Canadian arms), it requires nine major Canadian internet providers, including Bell, Rogers, and TekSavvy, to block four stream-ripping domains (Y2mate.ws, YTmp3.lat, Savefrom.space, and Spowload.cc) via DNS for two years, and to show visitors a notice explaining the block.

Justice Fothergill found the operators had infringed copyright by running services whose “sole function” was enabling unauthorized reproduction, in violation of Canada’s Copyright Act, and issued a permanent injunction against the anonymous “John Doe” operators. A dynamic provision lets Music Canada add new copycat domains by affidavit; if none of the nine ISPs object within ten business days, the blocklist expands without a new hearing.

Why independent artists should care

Stream ripping works by feeding a track’s URL from a service like Spotify, Apple Music, or YouTube into a third-party site that converts it into a downloadable file. Every time that happens instead of a real stream, the royalty that would have reached you and your rightsholders disappears.

How a stream-rip leaks your royalty
Legit
Fan plays your song
Licensed stream
Spotify · Apple · YouTube
Royalty paid to you ✓
Counts toward charts
Rip
Fan plays your song
Stream-ripper site
URL pasted into a converter
Permanent download
No further plays
No royalty ✗
Revenue siphoned
Where your royalties go
Legitimate streamStream-rip
Royalty paid to youYesNo
Counts toward chartsYesNo
Funds your next releaseYesNo (revenue is siphoned)
75%+

Share of Canada's recorded-music revenue that now comes from streaming

1.7M

Monthly visits to Canada's most popular stream-ripping site

9

Major ISPs ordered to block the domains

2yrs

Length of the DNS-blocking order

I believe artists should be paid when their music is played.
Patrick Rogers, CEO of Music Canada

With streaming now making up the large majority of recorded-music revenue in Canada, that leakage matters more for independent artists, who rely on every stream, than the major-label headlines suggest.

What to do now

The practical move

Nothing is required to benefit from the order. This is enforcement on your behalf. Keep pointing fans toward legitimate streaming and purchase links, where your royalties actually accrue, and make sure your catalog’s copyright registration and metadata are in order so you are positioned to collect what enforcement protects.

What is still unclear?

The whack-a-mole problem

The blocked services are themselves copycats of sites shut down before, and new copycats appear quickly, which is exactly why the order includes a fast-track way to add domains. It is too early to say how much royalty revenue this recovers, especially for independent catalogs rather than major labels, or whether similar enforcement will extend to other forms of leakage over time.

Sources

Related Velveteen guides

Artist-facing updates

Get music industry updates without the noise

Short notes on platform changes, royalty issues, and release marketing moves that actually affect independent artists.

Improve this page

Was this useful? Send a signal or flag a correction.