How to Disclose AI Use on Spotify and Apple Music
Both platforms now carry an AI-use tag that travels through your metadata. Disclosing AI assistance does not hurt your ranking. What gets you removed is unauthorized voice cloning and spam.
Short answer
Spotify and Apple Music now accept structured disclosures about AI use through delivery metadata. Spotify's beta uses DDEX credits, while Apple's Transparency Tags cover audio, composition, artwork, and video. Artists should document tools and affected assets before upload. Disclosure leaves voice consent, copyright clearance, publicity rights, and spam rules unchanged.
Key takeaways
- Spotify launched an AI credits beta on April 16, 2026 that lets you declare how AI was used in a track. DistroKid is the first distributor that supports it.
- Apple Music added self-reported Transparency Tags in March 2026 covering artwork, audio, composition, and music video.
- Disclosure is metadata you set through your distributor at upload, not a switch you flip on the DSP afterward.
- Disclosing AI assistance does not down-rank your music. Unauthorized voice cloning and spam are what get tracks removed.
What happened?
Both major streaming platforms now have a formal way to declare that AI was involved in a track. On April 16, 2026, Spotify opened a beta for AI credits, built on a new industry standard from DDEX, the body that sets music metadata standards. It lets you state how AI contributed, whether that is vocals, instrumentation, or post-production, and it appears in Song Credits on mobile. You declare it through your label or distributor, and DistroKid is the first delivery partner, with more expected over time.
This builds on the AI protections Spotify announced in September 2025: a ban on unauthorized AI voice clones, deepfakes, and impersonation, plus a spam filter that targets mass uploads, duplicated titles, and ultra-short filler tracks. Apple Music took a parallel route in March 2026 with self-reported Transparency Tags. Labels and distributors decide what counts as material AI use across four categories, and if no declaration is made, none is assumed.
Spotify and Apple handle it differently
| Spotify AI credits | Apple Music Transparency Tags | |
|---|---|---|
| Launched | Beta, April 16, 2026 | March 2026 |
| Built on | DDEX industry standard | Apple metadata tags |
| What you declare | Vocals, instrumentation, post-production | Artwork, audio, composition, video |
| How it is delivered | Through your distributor (DistroKid first) | Through your distributor at submission |
| Enforcement | Self-declared, not down-ranked | Self-reported, no visible automated enforcement |
Why independent artists should care
The important point is what disclosure does not do. Spotify has said it does not penalize or down-rank music for being AI-assisted. Declaring that you used an AI tool to help with a vocal or a master will not bury your track. What gets music removed is the other category entirely: cloning someone else’s voice without permission, impersonation, and spam upload patterns.
Disclosure is metadata hygiene, not a confession.
Treat AI disclosure the same way you treat ISRCs, your P-line and C-line, and writer credits. It is information that travels with the release, it is set once at upload, and getting it right is part of looking like a professional rather than a spammer.
What to do now
If you used AI on a track
Check whether your distributor supports the Spotify declaration yet. DistroKid does. If yours does not, the option may simply not appear, since coverage is still rolling out. Decide what counts as material AI use for each track before you submit, because the declaration is delivered at upload, not toggled afterward.
The line you cannot cross
Never upload a cloned or impersonated voice you do not have rights to. That is not a disclosure question. It is the conduct both platforms remove tracks and ban accounts for.
What is still unclear?
Open questions
Coverage is partial. Not every distributor exposes the Spotify declaration yet, and Apple’s tags are self-reported with no published enforcement mechanism. The two platforms also use different category breakdowns, so a single answer about your track does not map cleanly from one to the other. Expect both systems to expand and tighten.
Sources
Frequently asked questions
How do artists disclose AI use on Spotify?
Spotify's beta receives structured AI-use credits through participating distributors using the DDEX standard. Artists should look for the relevant fields in their delivery workflow.
What do Apple Music Transparency Tags cover?
Apple's self-reported tags can describe AI involvement in artwork, audio, composition, and video, depending on the metadata supplied through delivery.
Does an AI disclosure lower Spotify ranking?
Spotify said it does not down-rank music simply because it is disclosed as AI-assisted. Other policy, quality, fraud, impersonation, and recommendation signals still apply.
Does disclosure make AI voice cloning legal?
No. A metadata label supplies none of the consent, copyright clearance, publicity rights, performer approval, or licenses required for impersonation.
Related Velveteen guides
Related Velveteen tools
Get music industry updates without the noise
Short notes on platform changes, royalty issues, and release marketing moves that actually affect independent artists.
Was this useful? Send a signal or flag a correction.